Who's Trusting Who? Observation of Fundamental Rights in Judicial Cooperation After Brexit

The Scales of Justice in Peru: Judicial Reform and Fundamental Rights

Reasoning with fundamental rights

People often withdraw previously drawn conclusions in light of new information. This defeasible reasoning is also important for law, where judges often have to change their verdicts in light of new evidence. Here we investigate defeasibility in the context of conflicting fundamental rights. When, for instance, law to property conflicts with law to information, can one of these rights be “defeat...

Whos In the Picture

The context in which a name appears in a caption provides powerful cues as to who is depicted in the associated image. We obtain 44,773 face images, using a face detector, from approximately half a million captioned news images and automatically link names, obtained using a named entity recognizer, with these faces. A simple clustering method can produce fair results. We improve these results s...

The Beneficiaries’ Rights Observation in Depositing Operation of Riba-Free Banking System by Corporate Governance View

The banking system is executed by many beneficiaries such as depositors, borrowers, banking services customers, stockholders, banking staff and managers and etc. The beneficiaries’ rights observation of banking that usually is known as Corporate Governance in banking, has constructive effects on economic. The main goal of the research is the survey of beneficiaries’ rights observation in deposi...

Relationship between Ethics and Fundamental Rights of Individuals in the Iranian Penal System

Background: The main purpose of criminal law must be to secure the basic human rights or fundamental rights of individuals. But the matter is the relationship between morality and human rights. For the purpose of the science of morality is to bring humanity to the highest degree of humanity, and the purpose of law is to achieve relative justice and to restore order in society. Equity is also a ...